Reviews study credits earned abroad and drafts the reasoning for the examination board.
Developed in Germany · Hosted in the EU or on-premises
Delivered together with
Sovereign hosting in Germany, single-tenant from the first user.
Legal, tax and compliance expertise for legally sound deployment.
Advisory and implementation for the public sector, starting with the AI readiness assessment.
The application arrives with transcript, Diploma Supplement and module descriptions, usually in a foreign language. Each listed module is matched to a module in the university's own examination regulations, their level and scope are compared, and the result goes into a paper for the examination board. If the case comes back from the meeting because the reasoning was too thin, the comparison starts all over again.
55% faster processing here means one board meeting instead of two: the 92 individual comparisons are ready with source references when the examination board first convenes.
Processing 55% faster is the Credit Recognition Agent's headline figure. An application with 23 modules and a board that meets monthly reflect a typical course of events in an examinations office, not measured values.
The agent reads the transcript, Diploma Supplement and module descriptions and creates a separate entry for each listed module. It keeps the original wording alongside any description in a foreign language.
Module list for recognition PA-4471/26, 23 modules captured, 2 foreign languagesThe agent compares each foreign module with the corresponding module in the university's own examination regulations, looking at level, scope, learning outcomes and profile. Wherever they diverge, it flags the point with the source reference in the transcript.
92 individual comparisons, 5 modules with a flagged difference in scopeThe agent writes the reasoning based on the criteria of the Lisbon Recognition Convention, citing a source for every sentence. The board decides on this basis.
begruendung_PA-4471-26.docx, 6 pages, 23 module mappings with reasonsIt submits the module comparison and the draft reasoning. The decision is taken by the examination board and signed by its chair.
It sets level, scope, learning outcomes and profile side by side for each module and supplies the source reference in the transcript for every divergence, such as the five modules with a gap in scope. The examination board weighs whether that amounts to a substantial difference, which the university has to demonstrate; the officer in the examinations office is responsible for the paper submitted to it.
If someone applies in parallel to the examinations office of a second faculty for recognition of the same credits, it does not see that. It compares the 23 modules from PA-4471/26 and nothing else.
Connected systems
Operations
A pilot typically runs on your own data within 4 to 6 weeks. The agent connects to your existing systems rather than running as a separate, parallel environment.
EU cloud or private cloud. Processing is GDPR-compliant and models are never trained on your data. Details in the Trust Center.
It is based on experience from comparable projects and process benchmarks, not a commitment. We work out the realistic effect for your organisation during the assessment before the pilot.