Checks degree programme concepts against the formal criteria ahead of the self-evaluation report.
Developed in Germany · Hosted in the EU or on-premises
Delivered together with
Sovereign hosting in Germany, single-tenant from the first user.
Legal, tax and compliance expertise for legally sound deployment.
Advisory and implementation for the public sector, starting with the AI readiness assessment.
The Interstate Study Accreditation Treaty, the model legal ordinance, the university's own framework regulations and the agency's requirements each say something about scope, module size, examination density and learning outcomes. Whoever writes the self-evaluation report has to check the concept against four sources at once, in their head. Whatever slips through comes back months later as a condition, and then the module description and the regulations both have to be changed.
Before the self-evaluation report, the concept takes 152 checks; after the procedure, each of two conditions costs an amendment to the regulations and a committee resolution. That is why checking early saves 50% of the rework.
The 50% reduction in rework is this agent's headline figure. Whether a procedure ends with two conditions is for the agency to decide case by case, and the 38 module descriptions are an assumed size for a mid-sized master's concept.
The agent compiles the formal requirements from the interstate treaty, the model legal ordinance, the framework regulations and the agency's requirements. It lists identical requirements only once, with all their source references.
Criteria list for procedure QM-2026/17, 34 requirements from 4 sourcesThe agent checks every description for scope, examination format, learning outcomes and workload. It names every deviation with the module number and the source reference in the rules.
152 checks, 7 deviations, 3 of them concerning module size in the 2nd semesterThe agent assigns the existing evidence to the criteria and names every criterion that still lacks evidence. Quality management writes the self-evaluation report on this basis.
nachweismappe_QM-2026-17.pdf, 34 criteria, 29 evidenced, 5 openIt submits the list of deviations and the evidence folder. The dean of studies office and the senate decide whether the concept is submitted.
It measures scope, module size, examination density and learning outcomes against the formal requirements. The academic coherence of the programme is for the reviewers to judge in the procedure.
If an amended module description is still pending there as a draft resolution, it continues to measure the module against the wording in document management. Once the faculty council adopts the change, quality management files it and the check for QM-2026/17 runs again.
Connected systems
Operations
A pilot typically runs on your own data within 4 to 6 weeks. The agent connects to your existing systems rather than running as a separate, parallel environment.
EU cloud or private cloud. Processing is GDPR-compliant and models are never trained on your data. Details in the Trust Center.
It is based on experience from comparable projects and process benchmarks, not a commitment. We work out the realistic effect for your organisation during the assessment before the pilot.