Health

Group Governance Agent

Every procedural question in the group now raises a preliminary one: which legal entity does it apply to?

Answers procedural questions within the group, starting with the preliminary question of which legal entity is actually meant.

Open agent
Public administration

Four processes that take up the most time today

Developed in Germany · Hosted in the EU

Developed in Germany · Hosted in the EU or on-premises

Delivered together with

STACKIT Sovereign hosting in Germany, single-tenant from the first user.
Rödl Legal, tax and compliance expertise for legally sound deployment.
4P Consulting Advisory and implementation for the public sector, starting with the AI readiness assessment.

Working out the legal entity costs more than the question itself.

Two legal entities share sites, staff and reporting lines. Anyone submitting a report first has to establish which company it applies to, who signs it and whether the same figure has already gone out from the other entity. That exercise starts again from scratch with every report.

2legal entitiesSites, staff and reporting lines are split across two companies.
1procedural questionA reporting obligation is due and first needs to be assigned.
3queriesGroup controlling, legal and site management settle the assignment among themselves.
1duplicate reportThe same indicator goes out from both entities until someone notices.

Three queries and a duplicate report disappear once the question already shows which entity reports and who signs, and coordination effort falls by 45%.

The 45% reduction in coordination effort is this agent's headline figure. Two legal entities, three queries and one duplicate report reflect a typical case in a hospital group; they were not counted.

Three steps through the process.

Executive management and legal decide which legal entity reports; the agent resolves the assignment and shows the reporting line.

Resolve the legal entity for the question

The agent assigns site, department and reporting obligation to the responsible company. If the assignment remains disputed, it sets out both readings with references.

Assignment of the quality report, North site, 1 disputed area

Make the reporting line visible

The agent shows who supplies input, who checks and who signs. For each step, it cites the reference in the group policy.

Reporting line with 4 steps, signed by the sponsoring company

Check for duplicate reports

The agent compares the planned report with what both entities have already submitted. It flags matching indicators in the file note.

2 matching indicators from Q1, file note attached to the case

What the agent does not do.

It does not decide which entity reports.

It presents the assignment with references. Executive management and legal make that call.

It does not submit any report.

It prepares it with the reporting line and signatory. The responsible department triggers the submission.

It cannot see agreements that were only made verbally.

Anything not set down in a group policy or in minutes does not appear in the assignment. It flags the point as disputed.

Connected systems

  • Group reporting
  • contract and policy repository
  • committee management

Operations

  • Deployment modelEU cloud, private cloud or on-premises
  • Data processingGDPR-compliant, no model training on your data
  • Responsible teamsExecutive management, group controlling, legal

The questions that come up before the first meeting.

How quickly is the Group Governance Agent ready to use?

A pilot typically runs on your own data within 4 to 6 weeks. The agent connects to your existing systems rather than running as a separate, parallel environment.

Where is the data processed?

EU cloud, private cloud or on-premises. Processing is GDPR-compliant and models are never trained on your data. Details in the Trust Center.

Where does the figure “45% less coordination effort” come from?

It is based on experience from comparable projects and process benchmarks, not a commitment. We work out the realistic effect for your organisation during the assessment before the pilot.

Related agents.

Intake review, case 2026/04711

Skip to content

Page footer