One unaddressed objection brings down the whole decision
The nature conservation authority writes in, the letter lands in the electronic file, and it never makes it into the weighing memo. The decision is issued, and the error only comes to light when someone sues.
1consultee responseThe nature conservation authority's contribution comes in and does not appear in the weighing table.
1gap in the reasoningThe decision says nothing about this objection, and the statement of reasons never catches up with it.
2levels of reviewThe appeals authority and the administrative court examine the same point one after the other.
26months between decision and hearingThat is the time between the date of the decision and the hearing at which the court asks about this very letter.
The error costs nothing until someone sues, and then it costs the whole decision. The data sheet puts the effect of mapping every single objection at 50% lower risk of annulment.
The chain shows a permitting procedure involving several specialist authorities. The percentage is the headline figure from the data sheet; it was not calculated from this chain.