Administration

Naturalisation Agent

Eight requirements, eight pieces of evidence. If one is missing, the whole application stalls.

Checks the eight requirements for naturalisation, including exceptions and evidence.

Open agent
Public administration

Four processes that take up the most time today

Developed in Germany · Hosted in the EU

Developed in Germany · Hosted in the EU or on-premises

Delivered together with

STACKIT Sovereign hosting in Germany, single-tenant from the first user.
Rödl Legal, tax and compliance expertise for legally sound deployment.
4P Consulting Advisory and implementation for the public sector, starting with the AI readiness assessment.

Seven requirements are checked; the eighth is missing.

Proof of means of subsistence is missing for two months. The case goes back on the shelf, even though the other seven requirements have been checked.

1missing documentProof that subsistence is secured is missing for two months.
8requirementsThe one open document holds up all eight; seven completed lines do not move the application forward.
2requests for evidenceOne for the missing document, one for the exception that this document raises.
2xresubmissionThe case goes back on the shelf twice before it is ready for a decision.

The section head gets both gaps in one checklist, which cuts the idle time by 50% and spares the file its second trip to the shelf.

The 50% reduction in idle time is this agent's headline figure. The eight requirements are set by law; the two resubmissions reflect the typical path a file takes.

Three steps through the process.

The agent ticks off the eight requirements one by one against the evidence; the citizenship authority grants the naturalisation.

Check each requirement individually

The agent assigns every document in the evidence folder to one of the eight requirements. For each line, it notes which document supports it.

Checklist for case 33-0917/2026, 8 lines, 23 documents assigned

Identify exceptions

The agent searches the file for facts that could support an exception and shows the reference with the sheet number. It leaves the assessment to the section head.

Note on the exception, 2 references with sheet numbers

Name the gap in the evidence

The agent writes the request for further evidence with all open items in a single letter. It names the period and the type of document.

Draft nachforderung_33-0917.docx, 2 items named

What the agent does not do.

It does not issue the assurance of naturalisation.

For case 33-0917/2026, it records in the checklist which of the eight requirements are evidenced. The citizenship authority signs the assurance to the applicant.

It does not make the final call on the exception.

It shows the two references in the file with sheet numbers and the applicable framework. Whether the exception applies is for the section head to judge.

It cannot see certificates still awaiting legalisation at the foreign mission.

They are not in the evidence folder for case 33-0917/2026, so it lists the related requirement as open. If the section head knows legalisation is under way, she adds that to the checklist.

Connected systems

  • Citizenship case management system
  • electronic case file
  • document management system

Operations

  • Deployment modelEU cloud, private cloud or on-premises
  • Data processingGDPR-compliant, no model training on your data
  • Responsible teamsCitizenship authority, migration office

The questions that come up before the first meeting.

How quickly is the Naturalisation Agent ready to use?

A pilot typically runs on your own data within 4 to 6 weeks. The agent connects to your existing systems rather than running as a separate, parallel environment.

Where is the data processed?

EU cloud, private cloud or on-premises. Processing is GDPR-compliant and models are never trained on your data. Details in the Trust Center.

Where does the figure “50% shorter idle times” come from?

It is based on experience from comparable projects and process benchmarks, not a commitment. We establish the realistic effect for your organisation in the assessment before the pilot.

Related agents.

Intake review, case 2026/04711

Skip to content

Page footer